The Transition Towards Revolution and ReformThe Arab Spring Realised?
£19.99
In stock
About this book
Why do some Arab Spring uprisings led to reforms and others to revolutions?
- Uses four case studies: Tunisia, Egypt, Morocco and Jordan
- Explores the differences between revolution in republics and reform in monarchies in the Arab world following the Arab Spring
- Explains the reforms in Morocco and Jordan in an innovative way that shows how the leaders used religion to survive
- Takes a creative approach to analysing revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt, which can also be applied to other revolutions in the Middle East
- Helps you to understand the trends in the electoral victories of moderate Islamist parties in the transition toward democracy following the Arab Spring
The Arab Spring created attempts to transition toward democracy by the peoples of Tunisia, Egypt, Morocco and Jordan. This study compares the methods used by the secular leaders of Tunisia and Egypt to deal with people power demanding revolution with the methods that the monarchs of Morocco and Jordan resorted to in accommodating their people’s priority of reform. In contrast with the monarchs, the secular leaders avoided resorting to the palliative of religion to ensure the stability of their rule and were, as a result, unable to survive.
After the Arab Spring, moderate Islamist parties were, at first, elected to lead the populace out of economic deprivation and corruption. But were the ideals of the Arab Spring realised? This study evaluates the relative success of the move to democracy in these four Middle Eastern countries.
Reviews
A readable and useful addition to the literature on a momentous period that addresses a fascinating question: How did some Arab regimes successfully ride the wave of change that hit the Middle East in early 2011 while others fell? The seeming greater durability of Arab monarchies compared to republican regimes is perhaps the most interesting phenomenon noted by Alianak, and the one she examines most closely.
This volume goes far beyond journalistic accounts of the Arab Spring. It not only provides a necessary comparative perspective but discusses events within the much-needed context of broad theoretical views, including those models developed by the author.
‘This study examines why some of the 2011 Arab uprisings ended in revolution while others ended in reform. Alianak compares Tunisia, Jordan, Egypt, and Morocco, all of which initially elected Islamist parities, and their attempts at transitioning to democracy. The study finds that in countries with secular leaders, such as those in Egypt and Tunisia, the people resorted to revolution, while in Morocco and Jordan, where religion was used as a palliative to ensure stability, the kings were able to opt simply for reform … Ultimately, the study finds that the Arab Spring has not been realized and that, as of summer 2013, all four countries have returned to a state in which they prioritize stability in order to ensure economic prosperity.’- The Middle East Journal