European Union Enlargement and DemocratisationThe Normative Disconnect in Hungary and Czechia
£19.99
Pre-order
Published 28 February 2027
About this book
Explores how and why adherence to the liberal democratic norms of the European Union vary between Central European states
- Challenges key assumptions and understandings about the nature and effectiveness of European Union enlargement through an analysis of case studies of two comparable countries that have experienced differing levels of adherence to the liberal democratic norms of the EU after accession: Czechia and Hungary
- Conducts in-depth analysis of the processes by which both countries underwent their adaptations to the norms of the EU and how this informed post-accession developments in each
- Includes contributions from thirty original interviews with MEPs, politicians, policy makers, journalists and experts which add richness and corroborating testimony
- Contributes to on-going debates within academic and policy circles about the implications for the European Union of the ‘illiberal turn’ in Central and Eastern European member states by examining how the EU has responded to illiberal challenges to its liberal democratic norms, and by providing policy recommendations for how it may more effectively respond to such challenges in the future
- Develops a novel framework of analysis of both international norm transfers and norm internalization that is embedded in liberal and constructivist theory
Enlargement is often considered to be the strongest foreign policy tool available to the European Union, and is instrumental in the EU’s efforts to spread its liberal democratic norms in the post-communist countries of Central and Eastern Europe.
However, the experience of recent years has painted a more uneven picture. While the EU’s norms have proven to be reasonably robust in countries such as Czechia, in others, most notably Hungary, they have proven to be far more fragile.
What accounts for this post-accession variation in adherence to liberal democratic norms between the post-communist Central and Eastern European Countries? And what implications does this have for the use of enlargement policy as a means for spreading democracy? This book explains the processes and mechanisms which determine how the liberal democratic norms of the European Union can be transferred to another country; and why enlargement has had such mixed results to date.
Reviews
Michael Toomey's European Union Enlargement and Democratisation offers an incisive analysis of the EU’s normative strategies, illuminating divergent democratic trajectories in post-communist Europe. This meticulously researched work challenges conventional wisdom, advancing our theoretical understanding of normative power and dynamics of democratic consolidation.
In this book, Michael Toomey offers a frank and rigorous examination of the democratic trajectories of Hungary and Czechia since acceding into the EU. It expertly calls into question the role of the EU as a normative power while offering food for thought about how the threat of democratic backsliding can be addressed.
Table of contents
Acknowledgements
Introduction: The Myth of the European Union’s Normative Power in the Field of Democratization Practices
1. Norm Emergence and Internalization, and the Role of Civil Society Actors
2. Democratic Transition, European Union Accession, and the Role of Civil Society in Hungary and Czechia
3. The Values Gap: The Failure to Develop Liberal Democratic Values in Hungary and Czechia
4.The European Union’s Record as a Liberal Democratic Normative Power: The Instrumentalization of Membership and the Failure of Normative Change
Conclusion: What Can be Done to Preserve Liberal Democracy in Central Europe and the European Union?
Sources and Bibliography
Index